Please submit your article summary and critique in the following format:Summary:Full Citation (use APA format)Research Question and Hypotheses (could be more than one, name the independent and dependent variables)Design (name the research design, i.e. pretest, post-test with non-random control group)Sample (who was in the study and how selected)Measures (what instruments, tests, surveys were used)ResultsCritique:In this section you will critique the article and research methods with respect to its strengths and weaknesses. Address the following questions:What were the major methodological strengths of the research study?What were the major methodological limitations of the research study?Reflection:What are the major differences between experimental and non-experimental designs?David Reinheimer,
The Impact of
T7htoring on the
A cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking undeclared freshmen at a
medium-sized university in Pennsylvaniawas used to study the relationship
between tutoring and the retention rates and decision paths of undeclared
students. Undeclared students who did and did not receive tutoring were
tracked over four years to determine rateand longevity of retention, academic
performance, and time span for selecting a major This research utilized
a non-experimental, causal-comparativemethodology with data analyzed
through t-tests, chi-squareprocedures,logistic regression,and survival analysis. Findingsfrom the study indicate that tutoring had a significant impact
on retention, but not on GPA or on time to select a major
of university efforts to
retain students, nearly half of all students are still failing to graduate
from four-year institutions (Dennis, 1998; Fiske, 2004; Lederman, 2009).
Data show that the proportion of first year students who returned to their
colleges as sophomores in 2007-8, 65.7 percent, dropped to the lowest
level in 25 years (Lederman, 2009). The intractability of this low retention rate has led to a plethora of research studies into the efficacy of
student support programs in improving retention rates. Unfortunately,
research has not provided clear results for how to improve retention
rates, especially for the particular type of college student who has not
yet declared a major-the undeclared student.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss a study conducted to investigate
whether retention rates of the undeclared student improve with tutoring.
This study is a new area of research that may provide some strategies
for improving the retention rates of undeclared college students.
2mpact of 7htoring on Student Success
Impact of Tutoring on Student Success
Review of Literature
There is little research on the effects of tutoring on the retention
of undeclared students. The greater part of the research on retention has focused on the social and academic integration of students;
characteristics of the university, such as public versus private, size,
and quality; pre-enrollment attributes, such as race-ethnicity, age,
first-generation status, hours in paid employment, socioeconomic
status, high school performance, and SAT scores; and programmatic
interventions, such as first-year seminars, supplemental instruction,
financial aid programs, learning communities, and interactions with
peers and faculty (Pascarella & TRrenzini, 2005; Tinto, 1993). A review
of studies on tutoring reveals that the area of research most closely
related to persistence of undeclared students is efficacy of tutoring
for success of students at risk of dropping out of college due to GPA
issues, academic background, poor decision-making skills, and other
factors. Such research has documented the positive effectiveness of
tutorial programs on retention of the at-risk student (Colvin, 2007;
Undecided or undeclared students are students who are unwilling,
unable, or unready to make educational or vocational decisions upon
entering college (Gordon, 1995). Undeclared students typically represent
one of the largest clusters of potentially at-risk students on a university
campus. Twenty to 50 percent of college students enter college undecided about their vocational goals (Stark, 2002), making the “undeclared
major” usually one of the largest majors on a university campus. Within
the last decade, research interest in the undeclared student has increased
because of concerns about decreasing retention rates among this student
population (Gordon, 1995; Jurgens, 2000).
According to Gordon (1995), there are multiple subsets of subgroups
of students who can be found within the undeclared population. The
following are the three most common subsets at the institution where
this study took place:
1. Academically underprepared students. Some undeclared
students enter college as undeclared due to poor academic
performance in high school, which has prevented them from
entering the degree program they want to pursue.
2. Developmentally not prepared students. Some undeclared
students are not ready to make life-long career decisions.
3. Investigating students. Some undeclared students are interested in exploring various majors by taking general education
courses and introductory level major courses before declaring a major.
Journalof College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011
Because the undeclared student is often unwilling or unable to declare
a major, the undeclared student may be disconnected academically and
socially. As Tinto (1993) postulates, students who are disconnected and
not integrated (socially and academically) into the fabric of a university
are less likely to be retained. The undeclared student may not become
fully integrated because she does not identify herself with an academic
department (Young & Redlinger, 2000). Undeclared students may be
disconnected socially from an institution because they do not have opportunities, comparable to those students who have declared a major,
to interact on a weekly basis with groups of students who have similar
academic interests. These students often do not have the opportunities
to participate in extracurricular academic programs offered by specific
major departments and do not have the same opportunities as their
declared counterparts to become connected to a network of professors
within particular majors. As Wolff and Tinney (2006) point out, the social
and academic experience a student has within an institution may be
more important than individual-level predictors such as prior academic
experiences, background characteristics, or personality.
Research further asserts that one means of contributing positively to
the social and academic integration of a student, and perhaps especially
the undeclared student, is by providing frequent and substantive peer
and faculty interaction (Pascarella & Tbrenzini, 2005). Researchers have
not established the specific type of interactive or academic experience
that provides for social and academic integration (Flowers, 2006); however, tutoring might be one form of interactive and academic experience
that may help the undeclared student be retained longer.
It is reasonable to assume that tutoring can provide a social connection
for the undeclared student to the campus community-a connection
outside the context of the classroom. Tutoring may provide a means
for the undeclared student to become more socially integrated because
tutoring fits the theory that knowledge is socially constructed (Belenky,
Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986; Claxton, 1991; Hartman, 1990).
Tutoring naturally creates a learning environment where knowledge is
socially constructed, where tutors and students interact on an informal
basis, and where material is clarified and understood with contributions
made by both the tutor and the tutee (MacDonald, 2000). This type of
learning environment inherent in tutoring provides students the means
to develop a relationship and a sense ofbelonging within an institution of
higher education (Thomas, 2006). Research cited in Stephen, O’Connell
and Hall (2008) stresses that students realize the importance of a good
relationship with their tutor because the tutor provides both personal
and academic support.
Impact of MTtoring on Student Success
As with most students, the undeclared student may become more
socially integrated into the university community by engaging in
substantive interaction with a tutor. Since undeclared students lack a
major, this type of environment provides the undeclared student with
the opportunity to engage in substantive peer interactions, which might
not otherwise occur. Tutoring can smooth the progression of the social
and academic integration of the undeclared student, and some research
shows that students who are tutored are able to improve their grades,
motivation, and learning skills through the social interaction of tutoring
sessions (Hartman, 1990).
The research surveyed above establishes a need for a study to examine
the role that tutoring may play in retaining undeclared students at their
institution. The study we conducted examined data collected on two sets
of undeclared students, those who have received tutoring versus those
who have not received tutoring. Multiple dimensions of the relationship
between tutoring and the decision path of undeclared students explored
in this study are expressed as hypotheses below:
Hj: Undeclared students who receive tutoring are more likely to
be retained than those who do not receive tutoring.
H : Undeclared students who receive tutoring will be retained
longer than those who do not.
H 3: Undeclared students who receive tutoring will earn a higher
grade point average (GPA) than those who do not.
H,: Undeclared students who receive tutoring are more likely
to select a major by the end of their second year than those
who do not.
The sample for this study consisted of undeclared students enrolled
at a mid-sized public university in Pennsylvania in the Fall Semester of
2004. A total of 207 students, consisting of 117 females and 90 males, were
tracked for four cohort years, 2004-2008. Within this four-year time of the
study, 57 of the students graduated, 85 of the students withdrew from
college, and 65 students were still enrolled in college. Of the 207 students
in the study, approximately 37% (77 students) received tutoring.
Student records were examined to collect academic information and
to identify students who graduated or withdrew from college. For each
student, the number of subjects in which tutors were requested was
recorded for each semester the students were enrolled.
Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011
The methodological design of this study was causal-comparative,
or non-experimental, research, with both descriptive and inferential
procedures used to analyze the data. Causal-comparative designs are
appropriate for studies involving preexisting data and when the independent variable cannot be manipulated (Gay, Mills, & Airasian, 2006).
The primary independent variable in this study was a grouping variable
involving students who were and were not tutored. Since it is not ethical
to randomly assign students to such a group, a true experimental study
was not possible for this research.
For the descriptive analyses of this study, means, standard deviations,
and correlations were calculated, while t-tests, chi-square procedures,
logistic regression, and survival analyses were utilized to conduct the
inferential analyses. The level of significance, a, for all statistical tests
was set at .05, and all statistical analyses were conducted with the SAS
Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of performance
variables on retention. This procedure determines the relationship
between independent and dependent variables when the dependent
variable is dichotomous, such as whether or not a student graduated.
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to model the time until
the occurrence of some event (Zwick, 1991). In any study across time,
some of the participants will not reach the target event (e.g., graduation) before data collection is terminated. These observations are
considered to be censored. By controlling for censored data, survival
analysis provides a clearer picture of when an event is likely to occur
For the purposes of this study, variable names were created to
more efficiently describe the dataset. Those variable names and
their descriptions are STATUS (whether a student was retained or
withdrew), TUTORED (whether or not a student was tutored), FINALGPA (student’s final cumulative grade point average), GRADSTATUS (whether a student was retained, graduated, or withdrew from
school), VSAT (verbal SAT score), MSAT (math SAT score), HSRANK
(high school rank), GENDER, and MAJORSTATUS (whether a student
declared a major, withdrew from school before declaring a major,
or had not yet declared a major at the end of the study). Verbal SAT
score (VSAT), MSAT, HSRANK, and GENDER were included in the
analyses because of their possible associations with college academic
Impact of Tutoring on Student Success
The results of selected data analyses are given in Thbles I through 7.
Significant results were found for the contingency table for GRADSTATUS
by TUTORED (Thble 1), and for the variables VSAT and MSAT for the
TUTORED group (Tible 2). No significance was found between the
TUTORED group levels for the variables FINALGPA and HSRANK
An examination of the expected values in Thble 1 reveals that, among
those students who were tutored, fewer students than expected withdrew from school, while more students than expected graduated or were
retained. Among the students who were not tutored, however, more
students than expected withdrew from school and fewer students than
expected graduated or were retained. From the t-test results in Table 2,
it can be seen that students who were tutored had significantly lower
verbal and math SAT scores than students who were not tutored. No
significant differences were found between students who were and were
not tutored for high school rank and final grade point averages.
The logistic regression analysis (Table 3) found TUTORED to be a
significant predictor for STATUS. Five variables were entered into the
logistic regression model, but only the dichotomous variable TUTORED
emerged as a significant predictor for whether or not a student was
The results of the survival analysis for GRADSTATUS (Thbles 4-6)
showed that students who were tutored were retained longer than
students who were not tutored. The cumulative survival rates in column 2 of Tables 4 and 5 show higher survival rates for each semester
for the tutored group than for the undeclared students who were not
tutored. The Wilcoxon test results in ‘Table 6 reveal the significance of
The survival analysis for MAJORSTATUS (Ibable 7) showed that students who were tutored took longer to declare a major than students
who were not tutored. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates for these results
are not tabled here, but the Wilcoxon test results in Mible 7 show that
there is a significant difference for the time taken to declare a major in
favor of the undeclared students who were not tutored.
Journalof College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011
The Contingency Table for GRADSTATUS Crossed With TUTORED
Note. Numbers in parenthesis represent expected cell values.
IX2(2) = 7.97, p < .05. Thble 2 Descriptive Statistics and t-Test Comparisonsfor the Variables FINALGPA, VSAT, MSAT, and HSRANK Grouped by TUTORED t-Score F-Ratio 0.06 1.48 57.90 61.42 2.47* 1.13 473.60 499.10 64.03 63.12 2.79** 1.03 126.00 141.90 99.76 100.79 1.05 1.02 Mean Std. Dev. Variable N FINALGPA 55 68 2.93 2.94 0.43 0.52 VSAT 77 130 476.50 497.90 MSAT 77 130 HSRANK 68 121 Note. The first line for each variable represents the statistics for students who were tutored, and the second line is for students who were not tutored. *p < .05. **p < .01. Impact of Mhtoring on Student Success 29 Table 3 The Logistic Regression Model for STATUS (N = 189) Variable B Constant 0.15 1.51 TUTORED 1.00"* GENDER VSAT MSAT HSRANK -0.03 < -0.00 < 0.00 < -0.00 SE Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B) 0.35 2.72 (1.37, 5.37) 0.33 < 0.00 < 0.00 < 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (0.51, (0.99, (1.00, (0.99, Note. R 2 = .094 (Nagelkerke). Model X2(= **p < .01. 1.84) 1.00) 1.01) 1.00) 13.14, p < .05. Thble 4 The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Product-Limit Survival Estimates for the T7tored Group and GRADSTATUS Semester (Sem) Cum Surv Rate (K-M) Survival Std Err Cum N W/drawn Censored Obs (Cum) Cum N Cont 0 1 2 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.02 0 0 2 0 0 0 77 77 75 3 4 5 6 0.87 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 10 11 14 17 0 0 0 0 67 66 63 60 7 8 0.74 0.71 0.05 0.05 20 22 2 55 57 0 30 Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011 Thble 5 The Kaplan-Meier(K-M) Product-Limit Survival Estimates for the No 74toring Group and GRADSTATUS Semester (Sem) Cum Surv Rate (K-M) Survival Std Err Cum N W/drawn Censored Obs (Cum) Cum N Cont 0 1 2 1.00 0.99 0.89 0.00 0.02 0.12 0 2 15 0 0 0 130 128 115 3 4 5 0.76 0.69 0.60 0.24 0.31 0.40 31 40 52 0 0 0 99 90 78 6 0.57 0.43 56 0 74 7 8 0.54 0.52 0.46 0.49 60 63 1 67 69 0 Thble 6 Summary Data and Wilcoxon Test for Survival Analysis Comparison for TUTORED and GRADSTATUS Censored N W/drew (Grad/Cont) %Cen- Quantiles Mean Std sored (Sem) (Sem) Err Group 7htored: 77 22 55 71.43 25% 7 7.04 0.21 63 67 51.54 25% 4 6.03 0.21 Not TUtored: 130 Wilcoxon nTst Results **p < .01. Variable Test Statistic Tbtored 10.92** Impact of T7toring on Student Success 31 Table 7 Summary Data and Wilcoxon RTst for Survival Analysis Comparison for TUTORED and MAJORSTATUS N Censored W/drew (Grad/Cont) %Censored Quantiles (Serm) Mean (Sern) Std Err Group Thtored: 77 63 14 18.18 25% 50% 75% 3 4 5 3.89 0.22 82 48 36.92 25% 50% 75% 2 3 4 3.30 0.18 Not Tutored: 130 Wilcoxon Tbst Results Variable Thst Statistic TUtored 6.97* *p < .05. Discussion Hypotheses 1 and 2 The results of this study demonstrate the positive impact of tutoring on students' academic performance and retention in college. The contingency table in Table 1 shows the positive association between being tutored and graduating or being retained. Students who were tutored had lower than expected frequencies for the Withdrawn cell, and higher than expected frequencies for the Graduated and Retained cells. The analyses in Tables 3 through 6 provide the strongest evidence for the positive effect of tutoring. In the logistic regression in Thble 3, TUTORED is a highly significant predictor for the dependent variable STATUS, a dichotomous variable which indicates retention. In fact, TUTORED was the only significant predictor for the logistic regression model. 32 Journalof College Reading and Learning,41(2), Spring 2011 The value of a predictor for a logistic regression model provides additional insight into the impact of this parameter on the dependent measure. In Table 3, the values of the predictor variables are indicated by the column headed by B, with the other statistic of interest indicated by Exp(B). Exp(B) is e, the base of natural logarithms, raised to the power of B, the B-coefficient for the logistic regression, and is an indicator of the change in odds resulting from a unit change in the predictor. For the population in this study, the significant predictor was TUTORED, which had a value for Exp(B) of 2.715. The interpretation of this statistic is that a student who requests tutoring is more than 2.7 times as likely to be retained as a student who does not request tutoring. Therefore, hypothesis 1 was supported. MTbles 4 through 6 give the results of the survival analysis for the effect of tutoring on the duration of retention for undeclared students. Tables 4 and 5 give the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for the undeclared students who were and were not tutored. An inspection of the survival rates shows that for each semester the survival rates for the tutored group were higher than those for the non-tutored group. These findings are further supported by the summary data in Thble 6, which shows a higher percentage of students retained or graduated for the tutored group. In addition, the mean number of semesters that students were retained was one semester longer for students who were tutored, and the number of semesters it took to reach the upper 25th percentile for the cumulative survival rate was higher for the tutored group (7) than for the non-tutored group (4). Finally, the Wilcoxon test results in Table 6 confirm that the students who were tutored were retained significantly longer than those students who were not. Thus, hypothesis 2 was supported. Hypothesis 3 From TMble 2 we see that there was no difference in the final grade point averages of students who were and were not tutored, thus, hypothesis 3 was not supported. However, an examination of Table 2 also shows that the students who were tutored had significantly lower math and verbal SAT scores than the students who were not tutored. This would indicate that the students who were tutored had a pre-college profile more closely aligned with that of at-risk students. Since there was no difference in the FINALGPA for both levels of the TUTORED group, it would appear that tutoring may have had some positive impact on the cohort of students who were tutored. This finding makes the significance of TUTORED in the logistic regression and survival analyses all the more impressive. Impact of MTtoring on Student Success 33 Hypothesis 4 The results of the survival analysis for the time to declare a major showed that the students who were not tutored took significantly less time to declare a major than students who were tutored (Table 7). Thus, hypothesis 4 was not supported. While it was expected that tutoring would facilitate undeclared students in declaring a major, it may be that the risk features characterizing the cohort of students who were tutored affected this finding. These students were more likely to have lower freshman GPAs, which could delay their access to majors with minimum GPA requirements. Limitations and Recommendations One limitation to the study is that the results of this research are restricted in application to the population of undeclared students at the university at which this study was conducted. These findings are certainly very useful and most important for this institution, and since many colleges and universities have large numbers of undeclared students, the outcomes from this research would likely apply to numerous university settings. However, to make generalizations to a broad population, this study needs to be replicated with student samples from a variety of colleges and universities with different demographics. Additionally, students other than undeclared students should be included in such studies. A second limitation to this research is that the study was restricted to just a few variables. As evidenced from the R 2 value in the logistic regression model, there are more variables that need to be considered for studies such as this. Variables such as motivation, self-regulation, and self-reliance may prompt undeclared students to seek tutoring and to persist academically, although controlling for such variables may be difficult (Gattis, 2002). Future studies should investigate the effects of these and other variables, along with the problem of self-selection bias, to more accurately evaluate the effect of tutoring on retention and academic success. Another possible limitation is that tutoring was measured as a dichotomous variable. A tutoring variable that was measured as interval/ratio might have enhanced the interpretation of the influence of tutoring in this model, allowing the strength of tutoring to be manifested on a gradient. It should be noted, however, that the dichotomous structure of TUTORED can also signify the importance of tutoring in the regression model. As a significant variable in a yes/no format, TUTORED is indicating that the mere presence of tutoring is positively associated with the outcome variable, which can be viewed as a compelling endorsement of the value of tutoring. 34 Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011 Conclusions It appears that tutoring has a positive impact on the persistence, retention and degree attainment for undeclared students. The results of this study support this assertion and demonstrate that, for a local population of undeclared students, tutoring is effective as a strategy for retention and succeeding to graduation. The outcomes from this study reinforce observations noted in reviews of prior studies. Similar to the situation for other students, tutoring improves the undeclared students' academic performance, as shown by the undeclared students' increased rates of persistence and retention, and by undeclared students' earning a GPA above what is expected from SAT scores. T-htoring has been shown to enhance the undeclared students' possibility of becoming more academically and socially integrated. Professors and administrators working with undeclared students should encourage students to seek tutoring, thereby assisting students to become more academically and socially integrated into the fabric of higher education. T•htoring should be one of the key programs utilized to help change the future of retention rates, and by making the most of tutoring programs, we may soon realize significant changes in retention rates across more college and university campuses. References Belenky, M. F, Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & 'Thrule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books. Claxton, C. S. (1991). 'Taching, learning, and community: An interview with Parker J. Palmer. Journalof Developmental Education, 15(2), 22-25. Colvin, J. W. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and T7toring, 15(2), 15-181. Dennis, M. J. (1998). A practical guide to enrollment management. In D. Hossler, J. P. Bean, & Associates (Eds.), The strategiesmanagement of college enrollments (pp. 170-185). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Fiske, E. (2004). Refuse to lose: Thday's colleges and universities must work to foster student success. A reportof the Lumina Foundation,Focus. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/focus.pdf. Gay, L. R, Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educationalresearch:Competenciesforanalysis and applications(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Gattis, K.W.(2002). Responding to self-selection bias in assessments of academic support programs: A motivational control study of Supplemental Instruction. The Learning Assistance Review, 7(2), 26-36. Flowers, L.A. (2006). Effects of attending a 2-year institution on African-American males' academic and social integration in the first year of college. Txachers College Record, 108(2), 267-286. Impact of TMtoring on Student Success 35 Gordon, V. N. (1995). The undecided college student: An academic and career advising challenge (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Hartman, H. J. (1990). Factors affecting the tutoring process. Journal of Developmental Education, 14(2), 2-6. Jurgens, J. C. (2000). The undecided student: Effects of combining levels of treatment parameters on career certainty, career indecision and client satisfaction. The Career Development Quarterly, 48, 237-250. Lederman, D. (2009, January 23). As talk about retention rises, rates drop [Electronic version]. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/O1/23/retain MacDonald, R. B. (2000). The master tutor: A guidebook for more effective tutoring (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge Stratford. Miller, E. F (1994). The effect of developmental reading instruction on the academic success of underprepared college freshmen. DissertationAbstracts International,55(12), 3797A. (UMI No. 9512851) Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Pascarella, E. & Tbrenzini, P (2005). How college affects students: A thirddecade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Stark, K. (2002). Advising undecided students: What works best? The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal. http://www.psu.edu/dus/mentor/090107so.html. Stephen, D., O'Connell, P, & Hall, M. (2008). 'Going the extra mile', 'fire-fighting', or laissez-faire? Re-evaluating personal tutoring relationships within mass higher education. Teaching in HigherEducation, 13(4), 1-13. Thomas, L. (2006). Widening participation and the increased need or personal tutoring. In L. Thomas & P Hixenbaugh (Eds.), Personaltutoring in higher education (pp. 21-31). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and the cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Thpping, K. (1998). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. In S. Goodlad (Ed.), Mentoring and tutoring by students (pp. 49-69). London, UK: Kogan. Wolff, M. K., & Tinney, S. M. (2006). Service-learning & college success. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10 (1), 57-61. Young, D. Y., & Redlinger, L. J. (2000). Modeling student flows through the university pipelines. Paper presented at the 41st Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, San Antonio, TX. Zwick, R. (1991). Difference in graduate school attainment patterns across academic programsand demographicgroups: A research report of the Minority GraduateEducation "Project. Princeton, (ED354852) NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from ERIC database. 36 Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), Spring 2011 David C. Rheinheimer, Ed.D., is Distinguished Professor and Director of the University-Wide Titorial Programat East Stroudsburg University. Dr Rheinheimer also serves as adjunct professor to the Department of Professional and Secondary Education at ESU where he teaches the research seminar courses in their doctoral program. Dr Rheinheimer's current research interests include student retention, selfefficacy, and other issues involving student success and academic achievement. Kelly McKenzie, M.Ed., is a Professorof the Undeclared Advising Program at East Stroudsburg University. Before serving as professor of advising, ProfessorMcKenzie was a professor of Communication Studies. Professor Mckenzie's current research interests include student retention, at-risk student populations, undeclared students, advising, communication, and other issues involving student success and academic achievement. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Author: Reinheimer, David; McKenzie, Kelly Title: The Impact of Tutoring on the Academic Success of Undeclared Students Source: J Coll Read Learn 41 no2 Spr 2011 p. 22-36 ISSN: 1079-0195 Publisher: College Reading and Learning Association University of Texas at Austin, UT Learning Center, Jester A332, Austin, TX 78705 The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited. To contact the publisher: http://www.crla.net/Welcome.htm This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sublicensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Purchase answer to see full attachment
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.